Employee discovers loophole within company half-day policy, allowing him to work for only one hour every Friday: 'Half days revolve around lunch times'

Advertisement
  • 01
    "Half Days Entirely Depend on the Set Lunch Time? Alright Then!"
  • Advertisement
  • 02
    My friend used to work in finance for a company which generally treated him pretty poorly. He was paid far less than he knew the company could afford, and was generally overlooked. They had home working for a while because of and then were allowed to come back to the office 3 days a week,
  • 03
    working from home 2 days. Whilst working from home, my friend loved missing the commute. Being an early riser anyway, he decided to ask his boss if he would be allowed to start work at 7am and finish at 3pm so as to get to and from work quicker, and because the office was open at that time anyway.
  • 04
    This was okayed, and so he started to work 7am-3pm, which he then extended to his work from home days. as he enjoyed having his late afternoons free.
  • Advertisement
  • 05
    Now, so that everyone was available at the same time, lunch time at the company was set at 1-2pm, no leeway. One Friday my friend wanted a half day to begin the start of a long weekend.
  • 06
    Because he would usually finish work at 3pm, he asked if half day for him could be earlier around 11am - since he would be putting in more hours before lunch than anyone else.
  • 07
    "No," he was told, "half day means finishing at lunch." So he had to work from 7am-1pm (6 hours) despite it counting, holiday-wise, as a half day. This annoyed him for obvious reasons, until he found a great benefit to this.
  • Advertisement
  • 08
    Cheezburger Image 10467441664
  • 09
    Working from home on Fridays, he started booking mornings off work, meaning he didn't have to work until 2pm. Then he worked for one hour from home and that was it. His colleagues thought it was genius. His
  • 10
    boss had very firmly told him that half days revolve around lunch times, so couldn't do anything about it! So my friend enjoyed a few months of practically doing no work on several Fridays for the cost of a half day at a time, until eventually he left the business and moved on to a job where he was treated a lot better!
  • Advertisement
  • 11
    zEdgarHoover . Still trying to get my head around fixed lunch hour "so everyone is available at the same time" in a company where WFH exists. I mean, in manufacturing, maybe, but this isn't that. That's so stupid it can only be a "leadership" decision.
  • 12
    Cow Launcher. I can visualise the cogs whirring in the boss' head, as he tries to work out how he can have it both ways.
  • 13
    nalanajo Brilliant, and awesome.
  • Advertisement
  • 14
    CoderJoe1. A classic case of the halvsies and the have-nots.
  • 15
    purgruv. MC to the letter!
  • 16
    RemLazar911 Is the PTO not hourly anyway? Wouldn't you still be using 6 hours of PTO to take the morning off?
  • Advertisement
  • 17
    Hello Joey Joe Joe. I need a job when I can take multiple hours off every week and not have it affect my performance.
  • 18
    EarlyGoose9284 Isn't the "lunch break" effectively a legally mandated break in the middle of a shift? It is in the UK, I am not allowed to work (from memory) more than 4 hours without a break
  • 19
    KTB1962. So between 1:00 and 2:00 there's absolutely no one working at that time?? That's not productive...
  • Advertisement
  • 20
    FoolishStone. Some offices, especially medical practices, close for lunch, which means everyone needs to take the same lunchtime. This helps avoid a situation where, say, a nurse has to cover for someone at their regular lunchtime, and end up getting no break at all.

Tags

Scroll down for the next article

Also From FAIL Blog