Railroad supervisor loses company $940,000 after his demand to change workers' schedule causes massive production delays: ‘He turned three shades of purple’

Advertisement
  • 01
    Cheezburger Image 10493453312
  • 02

    "Don't want to pay 4 guys to not work for 6 hours? OK, you can pay 30 guys to not work for 6 hours."

    To make an already long story as short as possible, some background. I am a manager for a North American railroad, and a lot of our work involves different crafts of employees.
  • 03
    Different crafts have different unions and different work rules. The managers of the other crafts and I work together well to get done what we need to get done,
    via Billiam201
  • 04
    especially when some of the work needs to get done at night. The track guys can have a crew assigned to nights, while the signal guys can't. Even
    via Billiam201
  • 05
    better, the signal guys who work overnight have to be let go after 12 hours, and if it's now their regular shift because they came in last night, they get paid the rest of the day to go hole and sleep.
    via Billiam201
  • 06
    Track guys have all three shifts, but we only have a day shift and an evening shift, but no night shift, because the big hats don't want to hire enough people to do it.
    via Billiam201
  • 07
    Now, the company has decided that paying guys to go home 2 hours early on a Thursday, come in and work overtime all night at 10pm, and go home at 10am, getting another 4 hours lay to
    via Billiam201
  • 08
    go home and sleep is the ending of all that is good and pure in the universe, and will eventually lead to the collapse of capitalism, the nation, and indeed the universe itself.
    via Billiam201
  • 09
    So they decide that the second shift guys have to stay 4 extra hours, and the first shift guys have to come in 4 hours early. I point out that:
    via Billiam201
  • 10
    1. I can't force employees to work overtime unless it's an emergency, and the union isn't likely to agree that "we want to do this at night so we don't affect traffic" is an emergency.
    via Billiam201
  • 11
    2. Not all employees are qualified on the same things. 3. Since they took half of my trucks away 5 years ago (because savings!!) I don't have enough vehicles for an entire second crew to show up
    via Billiam201
  • 12
    at 2am and relieve the guys working in the field so they can go home. The guys currently working will have to stop work, pack up the tools, drive back to the office, let the (smaller) relief
    via Billiam201
  • 13
    crew load up, drive back out to the work site, do the starting paperwork and briefings, and begin the work. And most importantly: 4. That while we aren't there, the track guys
    via Billiam201
  • 14
    can't work, because we have to keep taking things off of the rail so the track guys can do their work, and then put them back when the guys are done so we can run the trains in the morning.
    via Billiam201
  • 15
    All of it falls on deaf ears, because the freckle-faced college kid (who opens every conversation with "I have an MBA, ") who has somehow gotten to a position where he's in charge of the
    via Billiam201
  • 16
    estimates wants to complain. about those 24 hours a night. So, after having gone on the meeting record for all of it, I get out of the kids way. I decide that if my boss isn't going to have my back, I'm
    via Billiam201
  • 17
    not going to stop this inevitable disaster. After all, I have only been doing this for 27 years, but he graduated with a 3.6 GPA from UTEP, so he must know better.
    via Billiam201
  • 18
    So, the first night, the job grinds to a halt like clockwork at 1am, the second crew shows up at about 4:15, and they get to work. The track folks pack it in, because by the time anything gets
    via Billiam201
  • 19
    dismantled, there won't be enough time to get anything done and put it all back together to start moving trains by 7. Second night, the shift change was a little smoother,
    via Billiam201
  • 20
    so they got out there at 3:45. Managed to get a little work done before packing up. Third and fourth night it rained REALLY hard, so the drive back to the shop and out to the jobsite took extra
    via Billiam201
  • 21
    time. No work done after the new crew showed up at 4:30. Bright and early Monday morning we show up at our morning meeting to find that the track guys got about 30%
    via Billiam201
  • 22
    of the work done that they'd planned for the week, and at this pace would finish a 6- week job more than 15 weeks. behind, and over budget by more than 300%
    via Billiam201
  • 23
    Mr. MBA proceeds to launch into his carefully-rehearsed speech about Key Metrics, Percent Spent vs Percent Complete, and all sorts of other nonsense. Then he decides to start in on me.
    via Billiam201
  • 24
    Since I obviously conspired and colluded with my employees to "egregiously erode progress" for an entire week. I held up the meeting minutes from the previous week, told
    via Billiam201
  • 25
    him in no uncertain terms that he had asked, in fact demanded that we have a full shift change in the middle of the track department's work. I looked across the table at him, and asked him if he wanted to revise that position.
    via Billiam201
  • 26
    Completely unwilling to let this lowly engineer tell him what to do, he said no, and I was supposed to somehow magically make the shift change FASTER.
    via Billiam201
  • 27
    Next 3 weeks were the same story. They've now been out there for a month, and have managed to accomplish just shy of a week and a half of work.
    via Billiam201
  • 28
    Cheezburger Image 10493455104
  • 29
    Mr. MBA shows up on the site one night, just in time to watch my night guys walk off, watch the track guys shut down the machines and gather outside to smoke, hang out, and generally
    via Billiam201
  • 30
    carouse, because they know they now have 3 hours to S w off, and be paid for it. My guys had called me when Mr. MBA showed up, so I get out of bed and get to the jobsite just in time to see this
    via Billiam201
  • 31
    guy in his shiny fresh-from- the-package safety gear screaming at the top of his lungs to the guys to get back in their equipment and "get the <naughty> back to work!" They all refuse because they
    via Billiam201
  • 32
    all know that they can't work without us there. Not that they care all that much about our equipment, but because they know Mr. MBA has been throwing a little too much weight around, and nothing
    via Billiam201
  • 33
    makes union employees stick together better or faster than putting the sc. _ Ns to a manager who really needs it. I walk up during a profanity- laced tirade, and cut right in and say "Well, Mr. MBA, I'm
    via Billiam201
  • 34
    sure you're not suggesting that these qualified employees violate Rule which clearly states that they shall not, under any circumstances, run that equipment through a switch
    via Billiam201
  • 35
    that the signal department hasn't checked, would you? That would be a serious violation, and could get him a 30-day suspension without pay. And if you were to suggest that he do that, you
    via Billiam201
  • 36
    wouldn't have a union card in your pocket, and he would I have 30 witnesses that saw you give him that directive. So you wouldn't be suggesting that, would you?"
    via Billiam201
  • 37
    He turned three shades of purple, stomped back to his little white company sedan, and drove away. He held on to his asinine mid-shift shift change for another 2 weeks until he couldn't hide the
    via Billiam201
  • 38
    massive production delays from his boss anymore, and suddenly he wasn't in charge of the estimates anymore. The total cost of his little venture? Just over $940,000 over the course of 6 weeks.
    via Billiam201
  • 39
    But, he did manage to save $700 a night on those off hours that he didn't have to pay for.
    via Billiam201

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article