Friend Cara runs a "loyalty test" on her friend's boyfriend after she was told not to, and calls her friend insecure when she gets called out

• 
  via liaden

  ^{Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.}

• AITJ for telling my friend she can’t “test” her boyfriend by flirting with mine?

  
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654

• Cara is the kind of person who thinks relationships are performance reviews and everyone else is just extra cast. She wants proof that a boyfriend will pass whatever arbitrary test she designs, so instead of communicating with him, she decides to use someone else’s partner as a prop. First she tries to recruit the narrator to send a suggestive DM to her boyfriend, then she flips it and suggests she flirt with the narrator’s boyfriend. Both ideas are ridiculous, of course, the second one is basically a double dare disguised as relationship research. The fact that the narrator says no to both should be the end of the conversation, but it is not. It turns into a morality trial where the only acceptable answer is surrender, because in this universe saying “no” is treated as evidence of insecurity, not a boundary. 

• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via Lia Den

  ^{Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.}

• When Cara goes ahead anyway and messages the boyfriend from a fake account, she is not doing it to “test” him, she is doing it to justify her own behavior regardless of the outcome. If he reacts badly, she gets to feel validated. If he does not, she can tell herself she was right all along. The boyfriend showing the message to the narrator instantly undercuts the whole premise, because it proves the person who was actually being honest stepped outside the role she wrote for them. The confrontation is not dramatic, it is overdue. The narrator is not insecure, they are the one trying to keep their life from turning into a reality‑show script written by someone who confuses cruelty with curiosity. 

• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654

• The moment Cara decides other people are allowed to talk about her being “dramatic” instead of dealing with the fact that she crossed a line, she proves exactly why the loyalty‑test crowd is so dangerous. They do not want trust, they want traps. Healthy relationships do not rely on ambushes and fake accounts, they rely on people who can ask questions without weaponizing other people’s lives as props. Cara's friend is not the wrong one here, they are the one trying to keep the friendship from turning into a compatibility experiment funded by someone else’s trust.

• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654
• 
  via StockPut7654

Tags

Also From Memebase

Professor fails to inform student of test rescheduling, causing student to miss the exam, student demands to choose a new date: 'I got told to reshuffle my life'