Sibling removes brother from car insurance after he fails to pay his share, leading brother to get a suspension when he's eventually pulled over: ‘He had plenty of warning’

Advertisement
  • Driver gets his licence suspended.
  • AITA for taking my brother off my insurance after warning him three times?

    My brother (24M) has been on my auto policy since he moved back to our city, because his own quote was almost triple mine. His
  • share was 310 a month and he was supposed to send it. the same day my payment came out.
  • He paid on time for about five months. After that it turned into me texting on the 3rd, then the 9th, then getting half of it, then
  • getting half of it, then getting the rest of it whenever. By April he owed me 740 in back share.
  • I told him in February that if he fell two months behind I'd take him off at renewal. I told him again in March, and in April I sent
  • him the actual renewal date and said this is the last time I'm bringing it up. He said he was good for it and I was being dramatic about family.
  • Renewal came, the 740 was still outstanding, and I removed him. I texted him the day it processed so there'd be no confusion about when the coverage ended.
  • He kept driving. He got pulled over two weeks later for a taillight and got cited for no insurance. Now it's a court date and a suspension he's fighting,
  • and he told our mom I did it behind his back to teach him a lesson.
  • Officer writing a traffic violation ticket.
  • Mom's position is that I was right but I should have called instead of texting, because he doesn't read texts, and that I knew that about him.
  • I do know that about him. I still think three warnings is three warnings. AITA?
  • Exceptional_Kumquat NTA. He knew he owed you money. I'm guessing you'll never see that cash at this point, since he's got bigger headaches now.
  • cookitybookity Clear and cut case of NTA.
  • Swirlyflurry NTA He had plenty of warning, and what's more he acknowledged the warnings.
  • He can't claim "well I don't read texts, so it's your fault for not calling me" when he said he was "good for it", meaning he knew and was aware.
  • summerBackground412 NTA if mom wants him covered she can do it. I imagine she knew he wouldn't pay her so didn't
  • My_igloo_is_melting NTA. Mom is on your side. and that whole "should have called" is just her deflecting and not wanting to be more involved.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article