Woman Left Jobless After Hiring Manager Rescinds Job Offer When Discovering She Is Pregnant, She Gets Accused of Intentionally Withholding Information

Advertisement
  • 01
    But when I got the offer today, I told them I was pregnant. I asked if they could tell (genuinely did my best to make it obvious. Wore an open jacket, pants were hiked up mid stomach, even fitted blouse, even tried walking so my stomach would stand out).
  • 02
    I guess I messed up by not telling a company I interviewed with I was pregnant in an interview. Now they might rescind the offer.
  • 03
    It's really what the title says. I'm exactly 35 weeks pregnant today but I have the misfortune of not looking like it. No one can tell I'm even carrying a kid, and I had the same experience with my first kid last summer 2023.
    via CakesNGames90
  • 04
    Interview went fine. I actually got offered the job. But they asked me a question that I didn't really know how to answer. They asked me if I could start the first week of December.
    via CakesNGames90
  • 05
    The answer is yes. I literally can start and probably finish training before I have my kid (December 19th). So, I said yes. But when I got the offer today, I told them I was pregnant. I asked
    via CakesNGames90
  • 06
    if they could tell (genuinely did my best to make it obvious. Wore an open jacket, pants were hiked up mid stomach, even fitted blouse, even tried walking so my stomach would stand out). I was
    via CakesNGames90
  • 07
    hoping she would say yes because then it would mean they had an inkling I was pregnant before offering the job but she said...no. And I'm not even sure if she can say yes to that question
    via CakesNGames90
  • 08
    for legal reasons. But I already knew the answer. I told them the only reason I said I could start on December 1st (still can) is because it's not a lie. I
    via CakesNGames90
  • 09
    literally can. There's nothing preventing me from walking through the door on December 1st and doing onboarding. So now I'm waiting to see if I still have the offer. She said she'd call
    via CakesNGames90
  • 10
    me back at the end of the day because while the start date isn't the issue, not the main one | think, but that they need someone to start right away and I guess it's the leave that's the problem. Money isn't an issue.
    via CakesNGames90
  • 11
    My husband makes enough to cover our bills and I'm on his insurance, so I wouldn't even be taking their benefits. I don't need them.
    via CakesNGames90
  • 12
    So now I probably lost out on a job after 6 months of looking. I hate my life. Edit for more context: I applied to this particular job October 2nd. Listed start date was November
    via CakesNGames90
  • 13
    4th. I don't know why they delayed hiring for this position. I did not ask. So I forgot about this job anyway until they called me last week for an interview. I apply for 2 jobs a week and will continue to do so through mid
    via CakesNGames90
  • 14
    December when my unemployment runs out. It's part of the requirements to get unemployment. I was applying. for 10+ a day until the start of October. I was laid off back in May, found out I was pregnant in
    via CakesNGames90
  • 15
    April and was told 2 weeks after I found I was pregnant I'd be laid off. So I do have to apply, accept interviews offered, and if offered a job, try to take it, or I risk losing unemployment until then.
    via CakesNGames90
  • 16
    That's why I said I don't need a job during maternity leave, and we can get by on my husband's salary and his benefits and my savings and my parents are
    via CakesNGames90
  • 17
    willing to help. But if I stop applying to jobs, I lose unemployment. A risk to applying to jobs is...getting an interview.
    via CakesNGames90
  • 18
    Paolaheldmyhand Top 1% Commenter Most likely illegal for them to revoke the offer, but you will not have worked enough hours to qualify for FMLA. Your job won't be protected while you're out.
    via Paolaheldmyhand
  • 19
    bored_ryan2 For everyone saying that what the company is doing is illegal because it's discrimination for OP being pregnant, it's nowhere near that cut and dry.
    via bored_ryan2
  • 20
    This employer is going to say they're rescinding the offer because they have a position they need filled immediately, and OP will be needing several weeks of leave in their first month, and this puts an undue burden on the company to have that role unfilled.
    via bored_ryan2
  • 21
    OP likely will not have any vacation or sick days available, won't qualify for FMLA, and probably wouldn't qualify for parental leave if the company offers it.
    via bored_ryan2
  • 22
    The reason why the employer probably didn't immediately rescind the offer is because they're considering if they would be legally at risk if they rescind the offer (which they may not be at legal risk at all). If they don't
    via bored_ryan2
  • 23
    rescind the offer, it's very possible they will just fire OP when she has to go on leave, because OP has no accrued time off.
    via bored_ryan2
  • 24
    jejsjhabdjf I have no sympathy for companies but you're kind of acting like you didn't intentionally leave out that important information so I don't think you're a victim either
    via jejsjhabdjf
  • 25
    belooga_whael I don't understand why you would be trying to get a job so close to your due date? It would be a different story earlier in the pregnancy, I think, but barely a month before a due date that could easily be less than said month? Just doesn't really make sense.
    via belooga_whael

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article