Fortune 500 company fires worker over a rigged survey metric that's nearly impossible to pass: ‘Apparently the world’s leading financial tech company couldn’t afford to keep me around anymore’

Advertisement
  • Headset-wearing man covers his face beside bold yellow quote text on a blue textured background that reads: "it comes down to a horrible, intentionally broken formula"
  • Earlier this week, I was fired by Intuit, Inc. I was making enough money to qualify for food stamps and apparently a Fortune 500 company - the world's leading financial tech company - couldn't afford to keep me around anymore.
  • The reason why comes down to a horrible, intentionally broken formula. My job was to take calls from Quickbooks Online users struggling to use their crummy, overly complicated program and help those people out.
  • I found the job pretty easy for someone who knows how to use the program, knows basic bookkeeping practices, and can go 5 minutes without telling a customer to shut up.
  • Headset worker looks down beside bold yellow quote text on a blue textured background. “Why was my job in danger? I showed up on time and did what I was assigned to do”
  • A couple months into the job, my whole team's hours were cut suddenly. I sometimes found odd jobs to make up for the money but the point is they were barely paying me anything when they started threatening my job.
  • Why was my job in danger? I showed up on time and did what I was assigned to do.
  • But we were being measured by a made-up, proves- and-shows-nothing statistic called TNPS (Total Net Promote Score) - you see guys, my tnps was low.
  • And if that sounds like nonsense to you, just brace yourself: To figure out your score they send email surveys to any customer you have had a 20 minute discussion with.
  • If that customer gives you a six or below, you fail. 7s and 8s are trashed, and only 9s and 10s are considered good enough.
  • In order to "meet the standards for metrics" your score must be 95, meaning 19 out of every 20 surveys you get must be a 9 or above.
  • Why use a ten point scale and not a 5 (or even 3) point scale? Why not send surveys to people whose calls lasted at least 5 minutes rather than 20?
  • Why is the goal 95% instead of a humanly achievable number like 75%? Because F YOU, that's why.
  • We're only asking the people with complicated issues or simple minds to evaluate you. Well, a customer I succeeded in helping but was still grumpy gave me a 6.
  • A person whose comments said I "went above and beyond" gave me a 1. Another 1 came from a person who I lost connection to, only to call them back a minute later.
  • A third 1 referred to me as a woman (there are certainly ladies out there who sound like me, but I assure you I sound like a man).
  • So was I allowed to discard these obviously false bad reviews? No!! Why? Because f you, that's why.
  • So this means by getting these four 'detractor' reviews that I didn't deserve, I now had to get SEVENTY SIX people on the phone for a period of least 20 minutes- meaning this would take a mathematical minimum of 25 hours, or one full week after the schedule cut.
  • Each of these 76 would have to get survey emails, actually bother to fill them out, and give only 9s or 10s or else I am apparently fired.
  • TNPS clearly isn't a metric to measure competence, it's a Kobayashi Maru meant to justify firing good workers.
  • When someone puts you in a no- win situation, don't accept your firing or your anything else as a loss.
  • They don't deserve the right to tell you if you succeeded or failed, only you know that for sure.
  • And if you're going to fill out customer service forms, give the mother r a 10. Our lives are all hard enough as it is, nobody needs. their manager at Chili's lecturing them over a 7 because the margarita was watered down.
  • EDIT: Thanks for love, comrades. Bread and roses to you all. I'm gonna post a link to an article from a month ago that probably explains the truth of what happened.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article