Illinois company forces employees to use their own phones to authenticate into company systems, leaving them wondering who should be paying their phone bill: 'They say it's for security, but they won't provide work phones'

Advertisement
An authenticator app on a phone, like the one in the story.
via Ed Hardie
An employee uses their employer's authenticator app on their phone.
TenorClefCyclist When my company started doing this, I only owned a soap bar phone that I kept in the seat bag of my bike for emergencies. It turned out that IT had three other options they could set up. One was a keychain dongle with a rolling code, like some investment companies use. They could also send you a login code via a text message. I didn't want to leave my "bike phone" powered up, so I told IT that I only had a land line. It turned out their system could actually call with a voice pr
Small_impaler The Illinois Wage Payment and Collection Act requires your employer to reimburse you "for necessary expenditures or losses incurred by the employee within the employee's scope of employment and directly related to the services performed by the employer." Which includes a reasonable portion of your phone bill if you must use it for work
via HarveyIngram18
InigoMontoya313 It is increasingly common for employers to require employees to use personal phones for logging in and out through Apps such as ADP, using phones for 2FA, and even using personal phones to install an App based Phone Line for work. There are no Federal Laws against this practice. A few states require companies who make this a requirement, to provide a token reimbursement or monthly stipend. If you belong to a union, it is considered a significant change from a C.B.A. and can warra
via HarveyIngram18
wooops Request that they provide a cheap alternative like rsa devices they pay for
via HarveyIngram18
falconkirtaran In Illinois, they have to reimburse necessary expenses (or losses). If you didn't have a phone and they needed you to have one for this and offered no alternative, yes they would have to buy you a phone and a plan, in theory. In practice that may not fly; you are generally expected to own, say, a full set of clothes (they have to pay for a uniform, but not normal street clothes). The losses to you are almost certainly negligible: a normal sized app and minimal data use. Reimbursem
via HarveyIngram18
b0v1n3r3x Every job I've had that required a cell phone would either pay my bill or provide a phone.
via HarveyIngram18
555_1212 Your eligible for a tax deduction if required and you are not reimbursed.
via HarveyIngram18
CapeMOGuy I wouldn't want to use my personal phone for work. Should you decide to not take a stand, here is my suggestion. I'd just buy the cheapest used unlocked smartphone I could find. I saw an Apple 6s on swappa for 27 bucks. Can you get a Google voice number? It looks like it's free for US calls and SMS text. (If I misunderstand Google voice, someone correct me. There's are dirt cheap phone plans available to receive calls and texts.)
via HarveyIngram18
Sarduci Nope, we can't. You also then don't need to access anything off company property regardless of your job requirements.
via HarveyIngram18
duane11583 this is when you buy a burner candy gar phone. or you learn how to use the dou app instead of microsft authenticator
via HarveyIngram18
Happy_Hippo48 Work also requires you to wear clothes, get transportation to work, and rarely are either one of those actual tangible expenses are reimbursed. The Authenticator app on your phone costs the vast majority of people nothing because they already have a smartphone and unlimited data. People make a big deal out of this when it really isn't.
via HarveyIngram18

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article