We should all strive to leave the world a better place than we entered it—unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be a very high priority on a lot of people's to-do lists. There are quite a few people who seek to selfishly maximize their own position without a care for anyone else or a regard for the effects of their reckless need for self-aggrandizement and wanton urge for wealth and power.
Like what you see? Follow our WhatsApp channel for more.
Sure, all of us do this to an extent; there's something that's hardwired in our monkey brain that makes us deeply obsessed with and skilled at gathering and hoarding resources, needing to make sure we have more than all of the other monkeys to make it through the winter—or the means to take from the other monkeys if we need to. But, thankfully, humans (some of us anyway) are capable of altruism, doing things for the betterment of others without self-interest—a selfless quality that helps us to build the world into that better place, which we started off talking about before all of this rambling.
Enter stage right: This guy.
This guy wasn't a fan of his local government's proposal to install an electric vehicle charging station outside of the house where he parked his vehicle. The installation would have meant that he had to park his car a whole 10 feet further away at the next parking space over!.. So, he ensured that the installation didn't go ahead by crafting a legal argument that would make the installation impossible. Fast forward a few years, and he purchased a trendy electric vehicle for himself. Now wanting the charging station outside, after all, he sought to have the local government resume the project. They refused on the grounds that the charging station would make the area less safe for pedestrians—the argument that he himself had used a few years prior.
Frustrated that the local government was using his own legal arguments against him, the poster shared his experience with an online community for legal advice, seeking to find a way to strong-arm the installation into proceeding. Readers of that thread quickly called into question the hypocrisy of his desire to have the canceled installation reinstated now that it benefited his needs. This led to the poster then admitting that he had fabricated the information he used to originally block the installation, prompting backlash from readers that caused him to delete his post.
By that point, screenshots of the thread had already gone viral, and the cat was out of the bag. Multiple posts popped up across the web where readers lambasted the original poster for his selfish actions.
Stay up to date by following us on Facebook!