Sibling refuses to loan brother $100,000 to fund legal custody battle over his child, claiming he has no chance of winning: 'Better off accepting the truth and saving the money'

Advertisement
  • 01
    Cheezburger Image 10496346624
  • 02

    "AITA for refusing to give money to my brother to save his daughter ?"

    I refused to give $100,000 to my brother to fund his legal custody battle. AITA for this? My brother called out of the blue one day. We've been living in different countries for many
  • 03
    years and we're often not in touch. He has been going through divorce and custody battle for a long time. The divorce is really ugly.
  • 04
    Both he and his ex wife are extremely similar being stubborn, argumentative and always right. They are both ex- army.
  • 05
    So my brother asks for $100,000. Specifically, it's for the newest set of lawyers quote to conduct a last all out custody battle.
  • 06
    He explains it like a military strategy and explains it's a last stand and about showing strength. According to his new lawyers it is completely un- winnable, not recommended, a
  • 07
    waste of time and he is better off accepting the hard truth and saving the money. I personally agree with the lawyers based on what I was
  • 08
    told by my brother. Yet he insists it's the only thing left to do. He also said there is no way he could pay it back.
  • 09
    My view was, if it's life or d th then yes, but it's not, and it would only hurt everyone making this last stand.
  • 10
    PETITION FOR CHILD CUSTODY Given Name(s) Middle Name Phone Number
  • 11
    HOLYC PGIVEMEANAME $100,000? American dollars? For a custody battle?
  • 12
    Eva_and_Logan OP AUD. So not quite as crazy as USD.
  • 13
    EmceeSuzy You are NTA for refusing to give the money but why did you write: 'to save his daughter'? To save her from what?
  • 14
    Eva_and_Logan OP Save his daughter refers to him claiming she's not safe with her mother. The divorce is super ugly and both sides are saying / accusing horrible things. I don't want to go into details because it's impossibly lengthy and horrible what's being said between the two. Toxic to the extreme and honestly neither side is perfect.
  • 15
    EmceeSuzy Do you believe that the child is unsafe with the mother and would become safe if the father gained primary custody?
  • 16
    Eva_and_Logan OP This is honestly the hardest part. I believe she would be safer with her dad. But that is based on only one side of the story. Councillors have deemed the mother safe before.
  • 17
    EmceeSuzy If all you know is what he is telling you, I would not take that as reliable information. The fact that he called you asking for this money when his own attorney told him it is likely to be fruitless is a clear indication that he is not rational and not going to be able to be honest about what is going on.
  • 18
    anonaparent52 NTA v. does he mean "showing strength"? Custody is about the kids, not him. "According to his new lawyers it is completely un-winnable, not
  • 19
    recommended, a waste of time and he is better off accepting the hard truth and saving the money" There is your answer. Save the money.
  • 20
    Fntsyking655 NTA, the lawyers who have a stereotype of being money- hungry sharks told him not to do it. That shows just how futile his course of action is. Also he literally said you wouldn't get your money back, so so w that.
  • 21
    Eva_and_Logan OP I agree 100% with your thinking. And that thought process was my first too. But the lawyers are absolutely adamant that my brother will lose in court. Brother
  • 22
    also agrees he would lose. So if that's a conclusion then the status quo of the kids location won't change and it's only down to money.
  • 23
    wolofancy NTA Okay so it's 100k out of your pocket but it's also thousands of dollars from the mom's pocket in attorney fees that could be used to better the kid's lives. You made the right choice.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article