‘I brought the company to a standstill to make a point': Manufacturing comes to a halt when an engineer weaponizes a software flaw he had been trying to fix for months, ends up getting updates fast-tracked by the VP himself

Advertisement
  • Cheezburger Image 10510725888
  • Advertisement
  • "I brought the company to a standstill to make a point"

    I worked in the engineering department of a smaller manufacturing company (around 70-80 employees). My responsibility among other things was to handle any design changes; edit part and assembly drawings, bills
  • of materials, etc. Previously this was all handled by putting together a packet of actual paper documents that had to be shuffled from engineering to manufacturing, sometimes ping ponging back and forth if we were
  • doing something complicated that required input from various people within those departments. Eventually the company started to implement a software-driven procedure that was supposed to
  • Advertisement
  • eliminate the stacks of paper that would sometimes get lost on someone's desk. The problem was that our bare bones staff didn't really have time to learn all of the ins and outs of the software, and refine the process to
  • be truly efficient. Basically it was left so that if an item was entered into an engineering change order, it was locked down so that no one could build one, but also a customer couldn't even order one, or any machine that this
  • item happened to be a component of until the change process was completed. Sometimes this could take weeks. I tried explaining several times that if we ever had to work on some item that is used in several of our
  • Advertisement
  • products, this would bring everything to a screeching halt. My manager at the time understood this but could never get all of the people who needed to work on the software procedure to sit down and finalize everything.
  • Cheezburger Image 10510717696
  • One day I was tasked with changing the design of a hardware component that was used in EVERY machine we built. I told my manager that as soon as I started the process, no one in sales would be able to enter an order
  • Advertisement
  • for any customers until the process would be completed. He shrugged and said "do it", knowing that I was right. Within 30 minutes of getting started, a salesman came to my desk asking why
  • he couldn't enter an order. I explained what was happening. He left, and soon after the VP of the company was at my desk asking what needed to be done. So I told him he needed to corral everyone needed to hash out how the
  • software was supposed to work properly instead of the half-assed "just lock everything down" deal they left off with. He immediately called in whoever was on that list. It took a few days as I recall, and the component in question was expedited to be approved within the week.
  • Advertisement
  • To this day I use this story in interviews whenever I'm asked one of those questions, like "Give me an instance where you had to solve a major problem in the workplace".
  • Red_Cathy. Nicely played there, not your issue if they can't be bothered to set the system up properly.
  • rpaynepiano Manager was definitely on the MC train too. They'd clearly been getting stonewalled by upper about the training on the software. Perfect opportunity.
  • Advertisement
  • DfWZrgYf⚫ Doesn't sound like you actually proactively fixed anything here. You just passively waited until the problem got the attention of the VP, who then assembled a team to address the issue.
  • Tremenda-Carucha. The real issue here isn't just the software system, it's the lack of clear ownership and communication channels, so establishing a dedicated
  • task force with defined roles could prevent similar bottlenecks in the future, and maybe consider implementing a tiered approval process that allows for urgent changes without locking down entire systems.
  • Advertisement
  • mykepagan This is not malicious compliance... This is Good Engineering, demonstrating a technical need via concrete example.
  • DapperLost I mean, props to the VP for being "OK, how do we solve this" and just doing it, instead of assigning blame and pushing the sh downhill.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article