-
The duo had purchased a modest home together after years of uneven power. The homeowner worked on-call nights, handled every chore, and served as sole caretaker for the cats, while the partner commuted, complained, and stored resentment. When the relationship collapsed, both agreed to part on equal terms, each reclaiming original investments. Peace lasted until a squabble over a broken vacuum triggered the nuclear option: the partner demanded either a larger payout or custody of the cats.
-
Threaten to take my cats, lose €80K
The image does not depict the actual subjects of the story. Subjects are models.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
The image does not depict the actual subjects of the story. Subjects are models.
-
-
-
The image does not depict the actual subjects of the story. Subjects are models.
-
-
The image does not depict the actual subjects of the story. Subjects are models.
-
That ultimatum flipped a switch. The partner produced an elaborate spreadsheet, hiking the buyout price whenever spite required extra seasoning. Hidden in the formulas sat a simple truth: every increase raised the cost on both sides. The homeowner listened, nodded, and at the peak of greed accepted the inflated figure, reminding the partner that email agreements carry legal weight and that the buyer covers all notary fees.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Papers were signed, funds transferred, and the partner became sole owner of a house never wanted. The property then lingered on the market, shedding price tags like autumn leaves until finally selling at a steep loss. Between the bloated buyout, taxes, and endless listing reductions, the cat thief paid roughly eighty thousand euros for a hiss that never arrived. The cats now bask in sunlit freedom, purchased entirely by hubris.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
For a weekly dose of animal-themed community challenges - Subscribe to our Newsletter!
Can't get enough of ICanHasCheezburger? Find us on Instagram!