-
Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.
-
The pet sitter and the pet owner in this story are both in the wrong. The pet owner only wanted to pay the pet sitter $300 for six months of him watching her cat. The pet sitter thought that $2,000 would be a more appropriate payment. Commenters agree that the proper payment is somewhere in the middle, and they should've discussed compensation expectations beforehand.
-
Am I the bad guy for not wanting to pay my friend $2K for watching my cat?
-
via Tech Daily
Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.
-
via u/Swimming-Champion-90
-
via Raymond Yeung
Image is representative only and does not depict the actual subjects of the story.
-
via u/Swimming-Champion-90
-
via u/jajjjenny
-
via u/jajjjenny
-
via u/hummingelephant
-
via u/jajjjenny
-
via u/tHollo41
-
via u/OHarePhoto
-
via u/analogascension
-
via u/PhilipWaterford
-
via u/rohdawg
-
via u/rohdawg
-
via u/Flat-Replacement4828
-
via u/Swimming-Champion-90
-
via u/thereisonlyoneme
-
via u/Firm-Ad5337
-
via u/A_username_here
Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.