Project manager forced to clean up after incompetent coworker, Toby, who used AI-generated falsehoods for a key research project

Advertisement
  • An employee types on a laptop as her male coworker leans over her shoulder behind her.
  • Struggling with AI-dependent colleague and AI use in new job

    I started working for an NGO a month ago as a project manager. I was supposed to take over a couple of projects, and Toby, the guy who was managing them in the meantime, was supposed to show me the ropes. He's
  • hopeless in that aspect. Every question I have he tells me to ask someone else or to look it up in the shared drive.
  • Now, apparently, turns out we have to co-manage the projects and he's not going to hand them over to me.
  • An employee sits down with her coworker, reviewing notes he has made.
  • But that's not the part that's most annoying me. He is dependent on Al for everything. Email? Al. Presentation to introduce the NGO to someone?
  • Al. Notes? Al. Literally, the first thing he said on our first meeting is "just ask Grok, I prefer Grok to ChatGPT because it is not reliable"...
  • Ok, whatever...but then we go to a research-based document he wrote. The goal of this document is to guide field workers to do work with kids in under-served communities. Since I have a PhD
  • in that topic and years of experience (both practical and in academia) I was asked to look into it.
  • An employee takes a closer look at the notes her coworker made as the two sit down to work together.
  • Surprise. It's Al generated. By itself, if you are discovering the topic and stumbled upon this document, you could be tricked into thinking it's legit information.
  • But the redundancies, useless information, misquoted/invented/low-quality sources, and lack of practical application are really sticking out to me.
  • I thought maybe I was missing something because the organization of the document sections seemed arbitrary to me.
  • The employee shows her manager her corrected work on her laptop.
  • Maybe it was a strict structure required by a donor? I looked up the proposed structure of the document: Al generated, again. It
  • appears that Toby asked Grok to come up with the structure of the document, and then asked Grok to fill in the text for each section of the document.
  • Half-way through the document, I gave up in "editing" it. Why should I bother to edit what someone didn't bother to write?
  • I talked to my supervisor, who now wants me to write a document explaining how I would improve the document. I told them the issues, that the ideal would be to propose a new structure and for a human to do proper research with legit sources and practical information. Of course, we
  • cannot do that because we have a deadline and we are already late. They still want me to give suggestions to correct the document.
  • It takes more effort to write why Al is wrong than to produce the wrong information with Al.
  • So now, here I am: stuck with a useless Al-addicted colleague who cannot write, forced to edit Al slop.
  • The image of lan McKellen breaking down while filming green screen scenes for "The Hobbit" comes to mind. To paraphrase: this is not why I became a researcher/why I work with kids/why I work with NGOs.
  • Any advice (for dealing with Al slop in professional settings or with useless colleagues or both) is appreciated.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article