-
01
Manager said to follow the checklist exactly, so I did. Every single line.
-
02
Image is representative, not actual subjects.
-
But, occasionally, something will go wrong with something unrelated, and it will cause a whole lot of scrutiny from the powers-that-be of upper management. All the spotlights and microscopic lenses will turn up these off-process processes, and suddenly the manager doesn't know anything about them and just lets the blame flow downhill to the workers who were using them.
Of course, from there it's a standoff. Managers want measurable accountability according to process because it gives the appearance of order and control. But they also don't want productivity to slip. Employees are told to follow rules exactly, yet they are also expected to maintain speed, efficiency, and teamwork. But, the workers, once bitten twice shy, stop doing all of the things that they were doing to save time, and the reversion to ineffective, written process causes productivity to slip further and further.
This warehouse employee worked in a facility where staff usually ignored outdated parts of the nightly closing checklist to save time. A new manager insisted that every procedure be followed exactly and publicly criticized the employee for skipping unnecessary steps. During the next shift, the employee carefully completed every item on the checklist exactly as written, including time-consuming inspections and backup lighting tests.It's a tale as old as time: A manager insists on strict adherence to a process without understanding why people stopped following it years ago. Then reality catches up with them. Suddenly, the process can change, exceptions appear, and everyone quietly pretends the old rules were never important in the first place.
-
03
-
04
-
05
-
06
-
07
-
08
Image is representative, not actual subjects.
-
09
-
10
-
11
-
12
Want More? Follow Us and Add Us as a Preferred Source on Google.