Texas employee changes LinkedIn status to "Open to Work," now seeks legal protection after boss treats his social media post as a resignation letter

Advertisement
  • Location: Texas Employer is treating my LinkedIn "Open to Work" post as a resignation even though I never submitted written or verbal notice and explicitly told HR I was not resigning. What should I do to protect myself?
  • A young professional looks disappointed as he reads emails on his computer.
  • I've been with my employer for several years and recently had discussions with management about compensation. I was being moved into a salaried position,
  • and based on the numbers, I believed it would reduce my overall earnings. I communicated my concerns professionally and explained that I hoped we could reach an agreement.
  • A phone open to the LinkedIn app
  • After not receiving a clear answer, I updated my LinkedIn profile to "Open to Work" and made a networking post saying I was looking for new opportunities. The post
  • contained a line that could arguably be interpreted as referring to a past employer, but my profile itself still clearly showed that I was currently employed at my company.
  • I had also just returned from approved leave related to a family loss and a medical issue.
  • A young professional looks disappointed as he reads emails on his computer.
  • On my first day back, HR and management called me into a meeting and told me they were treating my LinkedIn post as my two-week resignation notice.
  • I explained multiple times that: . I was not resigning. . I had not submitted a resignation letter.
  • • I had not given verbal notice. • The LinkedIn post was intended to show I was open to opportunities, not that I had quit.
  • I even offered to correct or remove the post. I was told it was too late because people had already seen it, and they would proceed as if I had given notice.
  • A window with the LinkedIn logo.
  • What confuses me is: • I don't have another job lined up. • I had recently received . positive feedback and a project bonus.
  • . . No one had raised performance concerns. I explicitly stated that I was not resigning.
  • Has anyone dealt with something similar? Can an employer simply decide that a LinkedIn networking post is a resignation after the employee says they are not resigning?
  • Update: It gets even more confusing. The morning after the meeting, I emailed HR and explicitly stated that I had not resigned and that my LinkedIn post was not intended as a resignation.
  • HR replied: "In that discussion, we mutually agreed that your employment with Hotels & Resorts will conclude effective June 2, 2026."
  • The problem is that I never agreed to resign. During the meeting I specifically told them: I was not resigning.
  • I did not have another job lined up. If I intended to resign, I would submit a formal resignation email.
  • On top of that, on May 19, I was asked whether I could stay until June 5 instead. I said: "Yes, I can stay as long as needed."
  • That's another reason I'm confused. If the company truly believed I had voluntarily resigned, why would they ask me to extend my departure date and remain longer?
  • At this point, I'm trying to understand whether this is being treated as a resignation, a mutual separation, or a termination because I've consistently stated that I did not resign.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article