Employee accidentally exposes coworkers who were using AI to respond to emails and confidently providing wrong answers: ‘There's definitely a "well look who's the favorite now" vibe from a couple people’

Advertisement
  • Just another day at the office

    Cheezburger Image 10658571264
  • Accidentally got half my team put under review because I fact-checked a coworker's AI use, what do I do?

    Hi all. About three weeks ago we had a team meeting about Al tools, and my manager asked for opinions. I mentioned that I'd been testing ChatGPT for drafting client emails and found it kept giving
  • confident-sounding but wrong numbers when clients asked about coverage limits (we're an insurance brokerage, small to mid business clients mostly). I said we should double
    via Kind-King1491
  • check anything Al- generated before it goes. out, especially for anything withactual dollar figures attached. one of my senior coworkers laughed and said I was overthinking it,
    via Kind-King1491
  • and brought up a time she used ChatGPT to answer a client's question about a specific policy exclusion. because she "didn't feel like digging through the file." I said, kind of defensively, that the
    via Kind-King1491
  • exclusion she described wasn't actually how our policies worked and that answer could genuinely cause a problem if the client relied on it. Another coworker jumped in saying I was being uptight for a
    via Kind-King1491
  • policy I probably hadn't even read that closely myself. My team lead ended up pulling up the actual policy doc on the spot and confirmed I was right.
    via Kind-King1491
  • We moved on and I honestly forgot about it. Yesterday my team lead. pulled me aside and said our director had looked. into it further after that meeting and found the same issue in at least a
    via Kind-King1491
  • AI involved in everything

    A
  • dozen other client files going back months- wrong exclusions wrong limits, stuff that was Al- generated and never double-checked Now three senior coworkers are being required to redo a
    via Kind-King1491
  • compliance training, and I've been asked to help draft a "quick reference doc" for policy basics that people can check before answering clients (I have my licensing and background in underwriting, they don't)
    via Kind-King1491
  • The coworkers involved aren't hostile exactly, but there's definitely a "well look who's the favorite now" vibe from a couple people. I didn't say anything to get anyone in trouble, I was just answering a question in a
    via Kind-King1491
  • meeting. But I feel weirdly guilty that this snowballed into a whole review, and I don't know if I should say something yo smooth things over or just keep my head down and do the doc
    via Kind-King1491
  • Claudine-Keith You didn't snitch you just answered a question in a meeting and happened to be right. The fact that a dozen client files had bad info means this was gonna blow up eventually anyway, better now than after a lawsuit
    via Claudine-Keith
  • Sharp_Nothing_4012 You saved their jobs. Had the Al been accurate, they would be looking to create a bot and layoff at least half of you.
    via Sharp_Nothing_4012
  • Involuntary drama

    Cheezburger Image 10658572800

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article