Company changes overtime policy to avoid paying extra to employees, one team uses new rules to get $6000 more while working the same as before: ‘We were suddenly entitled to loads of overtime’

Advertisement
  • 01
    Cheezburger Image 10513073408
  • 02

    Changing the definition of overtime? Great!

    The company I used to work for changed their definition of overtime to be "Any hours worked over 40 per week" to avoid paying overtime to people who stayed later on
    via Dulaman96
  • 03
    any given day, and tried to encourage them to take that time in lieu. I.e. if you worked 10 hours on Monday, you were encouraged to work 6 hours
    via Dulaman96
  • 04
    on Tuesday, instead of claiming 2 hours of overtime pay. (Here overtime pays at 1.5x your normal hourly rate, even if you're salaried).
    via Dulaman96
  • 05
    When they changed these rules they forgot about my team. 99% of the company worked regular 9-5 monday- friday shifts but my team worked a 24/7 rotating shift.
    via Dulaman96
  • 06
    Just by the nature of working shifts like that sometimes you end up working up to 55 hours in a single calender week by doing normal 8 hour shifts with no overtime. This
    via Dulaman96
  • 07
    was fine because it meant the next week you worked 25 hours or so. It always averaged out to be 80 hours a fortnight.
    via Dulaman96
  • 08
    But by the wording of this new rule (which was written into our contracts by the union so they couldn't go back on it), we were suddenly entitled to loads of overtime.
    via Dulaman96
  • 09
    50 500
    via utah778
  • 10
    It added up to about $6000 per year in extra pay from doing the exact same hours as before.
    via Dulaman96
  • 11
    Hattix There's a little note for management in here. If what you're doing is meant to save money by paying your people less, and their union agrees to it it probably will not save anyone anything.
    via Dulaman96
  • 12
    Professional_Call No malicious compliance here. Just management doing what it does best :)
    via Professional_Call
  • 13
    Dulaman96 OP The malicious compliance was applying for overtime pay despite working the same normal hours as before.
    via Dulaman96
  • 14
    Valuable Customer614 In every state I have worked in that is illegal. I believe OT is paid after 40 hours for the week and over 8 hours daily. Unless you negotiated something different.
    via Valuable_Customer614
  • 15
    Dulaman96 OP I dont live in any of those states. Because I don't live in America.
    via Dulaman96
  • 16
    SenorTron Rookie mistake on the part of the company, I think companies with these sorts of rosters often spread the definition over a fortnight.
    via SenorTron
  • 17
    GypsySnowflake Wait, what were your hours? I'm not clear on what a "24/7 rotating shift" is
    via GypsySnowflake
  • 18
    Dulaman96 OP We had 3 different shifts, from 7am to 3pm, from 3pm to 11pm, and 11pm to 7am, and you would rotate through them over the course of a couple weeks
    via Dulaman96
  • 19
    Resoto 10 Hmm, interesting, all of the jobs. I've had have always been like that, instead of overtime past a strict 9- 5, we've always had flex time. A strict 9-5 concept is foreign to me. I've always loved it.
    via Resoto10

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article