Tech engineer is put on PIP because of a review that was done while she was on maternity leave, despite receiving raises and bonuses: ‘Is this as problematic as it seems?’

Advertisement
  • 01
    woman talking to man who is her supervisor
  • 02

    "Put on PIP based on review done while I was on maternity leave by manager who left - even though I got merit raises and retention bonus. What do I do?"

    I'm an engineer at a tech company and I'm trying to figure out if I'm overreacting or if this situation is as messed up as it feels.
  • 03
    Background: I've been at this company since January 2023. I've received three merit increases in under 3 years.
  • 04
    In July 2025, I got a significant retention bonus explicitly for my "valuable contributions and continued commitment." My team has high turnover and I'm clearly someone they want to keep.
  • 05
    The Timeline: August 2024: Announced my second pregnancy (my third child) at work - Shortly after: Director (filling in as manager) suddenly started criticizing my work, said it wasn't good enough for my role, asked if I even wanted to stay in this position, suggested I switch to a lower-paid role I took the feedback seriously and publicly pivoted my work in team standups - Late November 2024: Gave birth, started 20-week parental leave - Late February 2025: I received my full bonus for 2024 perf
  • 06
    woman holding newborn baby
  • 07
    The old "needs improvement” rating automatically triggered a PIP requirement. My new manager explicitly told me: - He disagrees with the prior assessment - He thinks the old feedback was "super shady" He can already think of examples of my good work - He's on my side to get this resolved But we still have to go through a 60-day PIP process to "document my performance" so HR can remove the rating from my file by the March 2026 review cycle.
  • 08
    The Problem: Our company is under financial stress. Only "solid performers" and above get bonuses (reduced due to company performance).
  • 09
    I'm currently rated "needs improvement," which means zero bonus eligibility in March 2026. That's a substantial amount of money I'll lose.
  • 10
    The evaluable work period for March 2026 is basically just the few months I've worked under my new manager (since I was on leave from Late November 2024-April 2025, and he didn't start until September).
  • 11
    But I'm being penalized based on a rating from when I was literally not working. Additional Context: - Two coworkers were promoted in that same March 2025 review cycle (while I got "needs improvement") - We're a skeleton crew now - not hiring despite being understaffed - Company missed revenue targets (though exceeded profit targets) My Questions: 1.
  • 12
    Is it normal to have a performance review conducted while you're on parental leave without your ability to participate?
  • 13
    1. How can I simultaneously get a merit increase, full bonus, AND retention bonus while being rated "needs improvement"?
  • 14
    1. Should I be concerned that even with my manager's support, this PIP could be used against me if layoffs happen?
  • 15
    1. Am I crazy for feeling like the timing of the negative feedback (right after pregnancy announcement) is suspicious?
  • 16
    My manager says he'll work with HR to make sure this doesn't affect my bonus, but I'm not confident he fully understands how the rating system works.
  • 17
    I'm documenting everything and updating my resume just in case. Am I overreacting, or is this as problematic as it seems?
  • 18
    Edit to add: The retention bonus letter literally said I was being recognized for my "valuable contributions and continued commitment" while simultaneously having a "needs improvement" rating on file.
  • 19
    How does that make sense?
  • 20
    Mysterious_9191 How's it fair to have a performance review conducted when you're on parental leave? Is that something you can bring it up with HR?
  • 21
    bluesunlion How would you even have a valid PIP if you were on leave, and never met for your performance review? If I were HR, I'd think that was an invitation for a labor investigation and legal liability.
  • 22
    avazah I'm former HR (now I'm industry adjacent) and I agree. I used to work heavily with LOA and something like this would be a massive red flag and the orgs I've worked at would shut it down asap, really easy way to get sued.
  • 23
    remy624 It is 100% not fair. Pip-ing someone on comments made 8 months ago while I wasn't there to participate is wild. I think my manager doesn't have leverage to change the process (or doesn't want to rock the boat because he's new). Which in and of itself is problematic. I don't know if I want to go to hr and open myself up to more scrutiny, or just prepare myself to interview elsewhere if need be. I'm coming up on three years there so maybe it's the signal that I deserve better.

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article