Company charges $40 for company gear, forbids workers from wearing it on the job

Advertisement
  • A female restaurant employee looks upset on the job
  • "Wait, you thought you could actually WEAR the uniforms you paid for?"

    I randomly remembered this the other day about a restaurant I worked at a few years ago. Fortunately, I started too late for this to negatively affect me, but my God, people were p ed.
  • So, fall comes around. Mid September I believe, corporate sends out information that they are going to start ordering winter gear for the staff. Not paid for, of course, but with company colors and logos. Standard stuff: light jackets, hoodies, fleeces. IIRC they went for like $35 or $40 a pop. Not cheap in other words.
  • Thing was, you had to get your order in by October 1st (Again IIRC) I started after the cutoff date so I was bummed. Lots of people actually ordered. We had a pretty large patio area. Also our to go staff worked in an area with doors opening and closing constantly, and our host area was pretty drafty too. Well, the shipment comes in.
  • With the shipment comes a note saying to remind employes "Winter gear is NOT an approved part of the uniform. Employees cannot wear winter gear when clocked in or performing job duties. Winter gear is for off duty use only." Store management didn't even know until the note. But no mistake. Corporate tricked people into spending hundreds of
  • dollars on stuff they couldn't wear on shift. The only 'approved' winter attire was long sleeve shirts under short sleeve work shirts. Also, everyone had already paid for this before the shipment was ordered. And of course, no refunds.
  • TL,DR: Company tricks employees into paying for branded clothes for advertising purposes, unable to be worn during an actual shift.
  • Commenters gave their takes on this situation, which were pretty bleak.

    Kok-jockey It's a restaurant, theft is pretty much a requirement just to get by. HI, when I was working restaurant jobs I spent maybe $200/month on food. Most days I didn't eat anything at home, would just fill up at work.
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply Yup. Some places are cool and have free stuff (This place was Text mex so we had some freebies). Others are just lax enough you can know what to steal without issue
  • Dinmorerensofa Id never pay for company logo sh EVER
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply Only time I did was paying for stuff at cost when I worked at a martial arts studio. But that was also my passion and was happy to get our name out there.
  • A waitress holds a plate walking across a restaurant terrace
  • WholeFudds I had the opposite happen. I worked at a company that provided free hats and shirts with store locations on them. I had a huge collection. A new companywide policy came out that dictated we couldn't wear any legacy clothing. I threw it all out because I had no more use for it. A month later, the company backtracked the decision, but it was too late. I was p ed.
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply Ouch
  • HaroldFH That sounds illegal. Surely it must be illegal somehow?
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply Don't see how if it was never explicitly stated that you COULD wear it on shift.
  • Key_Cheesecake9926 My work does free "appreciation gifts" every year with the company logo all over everything then they tell everyone they aren't allowed to wear any of it while working. Like we all just want to walk around town as their personal advertising billboards.
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply ONLY place I was okay doing that with was a martial arts studio I taught at. But that was something I was actually passionate about.
  • Cave Johnson82 America?
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply Yup
  • KidenStormsoarer Nope, it's either getting worn at work or they're giving me my money back. There is no option 3. If they try to argue, I'll be happy to get the state involved for deceitful business practices and selling under false pretenses. They sold it as work attire, they don't get to turn around and refuse to let you use it as such.
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply I don't know if the state would care. I wasn't there for the actual ordering but I can see corporate being VERY CAREFUL to not allow anything in writing saying people could wear them at work. I know the managers weren't in on it because they were just as p ed (several of them ordered stuff too)
  • KidenStormsoarer Even if they didn't state it outright that you could, the implication is there. No reasonable person is going to buy work branded clothing to wear off the clock. The fact that they didn't say anything in advance, but did make sure to say something when it came in, means they knew in advance that people bought them to wear on the clock and still took their money under false pretenses.
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply I'm not disagreeing with you on the morality grounds. But corporations pay a lot of money to make sure they are 'legally' correct. sometimes.
  • StrangeCharmQuark Was this New Orleans? Either my SO works at the same place, or this has happened more than once :P
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply Enough people have commented on this and another sub I removed it for that I think it's actually a common practice sadly......
  • steveatari Chargebacks.
  • PhoenixApok Original Poster's Reply Issue is most of these kinds of things are done as payroll deductions (which is what I THINK they did but I didn't order anything so I'm not 100$)

Tags

Scroll Down For The Next Article